Brits
can write, says Updike
By Nathan
Midgley
There
was one man everyone
wanted to see at the Guardian
Hay festival: John Updike.
And the elder statesman of
American letters had nothing
but praise for British novelists
British writers have nothing to fear from their American
cousins, conceded John Updike while holding court at
the Guardian Hay literary festival.
Speaking to The Guardian on May 30, Updike
dismissed horrified reactions to the suggestion, made
several years ago, that the Booker prize be opened to
American authors.
Alongside Saul Bellow and Philip Roth, Updike is part
of a holy trinity of American writers who some consider
the greatest living novelists. Understandably, some
Brits felt that a transatlantic Booker would be a one-horse
race.
But Updike told the Guardian, “I don’t
think Americans would have taken over the Booker prize.”
He noted that Ian McEwan’s Atonement
was “a staggering book [that] no American could
have published.”
“There is no reason,” he added, tempering
the implication of a British inferiority complex, “why
some paunchy American should be able to enter a British
prize.”
Muriel Spark, Iris Murdoch and Hanif Kureishi were
also singled out for the ascendent writer’s praise.
Writing about the interview he conducted with Updike
during the festival, McEwan returned the compliment
by describing him as “the finest novelist writing
in English today.”
|
|